Last Friday, Aug 19th, 2011 was a sad day in Palm Beach County Florida for Lydian Private Bank aka VirtualBank when it was closed by regulators. The banks assets were sold to Sabadell United located in Miami.
Lydian originally opened as a pure online bank in April, 2000 as VirtualBank during the Internet boom and was once a technology and service leader winning best online bank by Money Magazine.
The bank changed its name in 2002 to Lydian Bank and entered the private banking market in Florida with high service boutique style offices. While still maintaining the VirtualBank brand online the bank grew to over $2B in assets.
The failure will cost the FDIC about $293 million dollars. As of today (8/24), the VirtualBank web site has not changed and makes no mention of Sabadell yet however the Lydian website does display a notice.
Lydian of course is not alone, even innovator and leader online bank ING Direct voluntarily sold it's US business to Capital One earlier this year due to cash trouble with its parent company. It has been quite a year for online banking.
It is a sad situation for Palm Beach County with Lydian once employing over a 1000 employees and a bright future. The fall of the Lydian empire closes the story on what was once an online banking innovator and great company.
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
Monday, August 8, 2011
Small Banks Not Safe for Business/Commercial Accounts
OLBB mainly blogs about retail online and mobile banking but this is an important issue. As a follow up to our last blog post on the new government (FFIEC) online security authentication guidelines one theme is that the Feds are very worried about commercial/business account protections.
Read Carefully:
It is not required by law that your bank guarantee your money if it gets stolen from a commercial bank account. Therefore, almost no one does (Chase the only exception). Not only is there inadequate protection but the risk is high, because of the large amounts of money and transactions in these type of accounts.
Hackers already know this and have been targeting smaller banks because they are lucrative and vulnerable. In fact, small to mid size banks are getting raided at the pace of $1B a year. See the Bloomberg article link at the bottom of this post for some interesting reading.
Hackers are targeting the small banks commercial accounts because the smaller banks don't have the same security that the big guys have. Most of the small banks are still using security guidelines from 2005 as their security model. Not effective at all in a 2011 world of risk. If you have commercial/business accounts at a small bank and you use online or mobile banking, your money is at risk. This is a big problem for small business as a big hit in capital can shut them down. This hurts our economy in the ripple effect.
I believe that if a law was passed mandating that the bank guarantee losses to commercial/business bank accounts that you would see security significantly improve since the risk would be on the bank and not the business customer. Granted there may need to be fees added to pay for the additional security but a monthly fee seems like a better option that shutting your business down because you lost it all to a hacker.
For the full article from Bloomberg go here. ALso check out the blogpost on the new agency guidelines just released from OLBB.
Read Carefully:
It is not required by law that your bank guarantee your money if it gets stolen from a commercial bank account. Therefore, almost no one does (Chase the only exception). Not only is there inadequate protection but the risk is high, because of the large amounts of money and transactions in these type of accounts.
Hackers already know this and have been targeting smaller banks because they are lucrative and vulnerable. In fact, small to mid size banks are getting raided at the pace of $1B a year. See the Bloomberg article link at the bottom of this post for some interesting reading.
Hackers are targeting the small banks commercial accounts because the smaller banks don't have the same security that the big guys have. Most of the small banks are still using security guidelines from 2005 as their security model. Not effective at all in a 2011 world of risk. If you have commercial/business accounts at a small bank and you use online or mobile banking, your money is at risk. This is a big problem for small business as a big hit in capital can shut them down. This hurts our economy in the ripple effect.
I believe that if a law was passed mandating that the bank guarantee losses to commercial/business bank accounts that you would see security significantly improve since the risk would be on the bank and not the business customer. Granted there may need to be fees added to pay for the additional security but a monthly fee seems like a better option that shutting your business down because you lost it all to a hacker.
For the full article from Bloomberg go here. ALso check out the blogpost on the new agency guidelines just released from OLBB.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)